All articles

Training2 min read

Progression matters more than finding a magic training dose

Progression matters more than finding a magic training dose

A programme is not a fixed number printed once and followed forever. As the work becomes more familiar, the practical question changes: what adjustment makes sense next? Dose-response research helps frame the discussion but cannot remove the need to observe the person training.

The evidence in context

A systematic review and meta-analysis of resistance training in older adults found improvements in strength and muscle-related measures. Studies used different combinations of frequency, intensity and volume, with fewer studies available for muscle morphology than for strength. [1]

The variables interact, making a single universal “optimal dose” difficult to infer. A subgroup result should not become an exact prescription for every older adult.

Record before you revise

Keep a simple record of exercises, resistance and repetitions, along with how manageable the session felt. Use that information to discuss the next step. Avoid changing frequency, volume and intensity all at once when a smaller adjustment would make the response easier to understand.

Putting it into perspective

If a session becomes noticeably easier, the next step may be a small planned adjustment rather than a complete programme replacement. Recording the current work makes that conversation more concrete. The review's varying doses are a reason for thoughtful progression, not a demand to chase every variable simultaneously.

Research reference

  1. Borde R, Hortobágyi T, Granacher U. (2015). Dose-Response Relationships of Resistance Training in Healthy Old Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0385-9.